Let me guess: Alfred's 2012 April Fool's Joke.
This issue begins with a guy sewing his own lips shut. It might be the Scarecrow since he's spouting off about fear. And the lips sewn shut thing is reminiscent of the face of a scarecrow. But the Scarecrow was already featured heavily in this book! And didn't he also get a minor story in Detective Comics as well? Oh well. Ladies and Gentleman, another fucking Scarecrow story!
Since David Finch draws all women as if they were fourteen years old, I don't have any idea how old this prisoner of the Scarecrow's is.
I think Bruce's piano's keys have a non-standard layout. Maybe Robin was fucking with it.
And listen to that bullshit he's spritzing all over her. He's all over the place with his metaphor but I feel I need to say this: if she's bringing light by conjuring something pure and beautiful out of thin air, I hardly think that's impractical. But mostly, he's spritzing bullshit. Spppt! Sppt!
This is Gotham! Let's just keep all the newborn babies at street level with one thin pane of glass between them and the crazies of this town. Also, just one small sidewalk away from a street where any slight accident will cause something like this to happen.
For some reason, the guy Batman just kicked out of a speeding car and onto the asphalt is in the middle of a conversation he's been having with nobody. I guess he has just suffered a pretty severe trauma.
Nurse: "GO TO HELL, BATMAN!"
Afterward, Batman goes to speak with the little girl but, like the others before her, she isn't speaking at all. Batman asks her a few questions and then just sits with her sadly as she takes his hand in comfort. It's a nice moment.
But it's completely blown by the next page. Batman is back in the Batcave and Robin comes up to him to tell him he's been listening to Bruce and he's willing to mellow out and try to be less violent when apprehending thugs. And this is Batman's reaction:
Has Batman ever in his life had this reaction to anything ever? Sure, he's consumed by the case. I get that's the point. Also, the point is to give Robin a reason to have an emotional blowout. But I just don't buy that Bruce wasn't listening at all when he acknowledged Robin previously. Sure, the acknowledgement was the half-hearted "Uh-hunh" that a busy parent might give. And I could see Bruce not getting it or saying something unfatherly or not quite getting Robin's point. But not listening and not hearing Robin? Forget it! He's fucking Batman!
So I guess The Scarecrow could have left the lever turned to the shower nozzle versus the tub's faucet so he'd immediately get sprayed in the face. Everything's okay here! Never mind anything I said!
Man, I'm really being a picky douchebag this morning! I must have something to prove! I'm going to tear this successful writer a new one! He sucks! He's no good! Although, really, I want a good Batman book. And maybe this one will get there. I was hoping to hate Dial H because a big shot professional was writing that one as well but that was a really good book! How about I put the claws in for the rest of this one. Except most have my problems are really with the way the art is telling the story. I don't think Finch is very good at storyboarding Hurwitz's story.
Gordon takes the fear gas right in the face and begins hallucinating scary stuff. But the big hallucination is of his children and the way he failed them both, allowing Babs to get shot and James Jr. to go nuts.
And then the Scarecrow appears to fuck with Jim some more.
But what does The White Rabbit have to do with any of this?
And why is The Scarecrow after Commissioner Gordon when he's been abducting children up until now? Why the sudden shift in prey? Has it all been leading up to this moment so far? Were the children test subjects? Or were they simply to freak out Gordon and cause him to feel even more unable to protect his children, Babs and James Jr. as well as all of the other children, Gotham's children?
Batman: The Dark Knight #10 Rating: No change. The writing is much better but how can it not be? This book has been downright awful. It's definitely turning around as of this issue. But even if the new writer did approach with the idea of a Scarecrow story, couldn't DC's editors have steered him away from that? This is the third Scarecrow story for Batman in the first year of The New 52! He's practically getting as much face time as Bats himself. And Finch's art was just sloppy this month. I know I've never praised his art before anyway, but it was simply rushed this month. Maybe it was because he only had one woman to draw throughout the entire issue and he was just fucking bored.
No comments:
Post a Comment