Showing posts with label Newsletter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Newsletter. Show all posts

Saturday, October 3, 2026

Eee! Tess Ate Chai Tea: The Newsletter #32 (Second Week of July 2018)

E!TACT #32
Music Reviews, Strangers in Paradise XXV #4, Kick-Ass #5, Exit Stage Left: The Snagglepuss Chronicles #6, Hit-Girl #5, New Super-man and the Justice League of China #24, and Facebooking with Grunion Guy!
By Grunion Guy


The Prologue!

I just learned that my comic books for the week of July 18th will be late because they were on a train bound for my local comic book shop that was also carrying toxic materials which spilled. That means all of my comic books for this week will now probably be issues of Daredevil and Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.


Grunion Guy's Musical Corner of Music Reviews!

Your Song by Elton John. I mean Ewan McGregor? Whatever. The version from Moulin Rouge!
One thing I think I've heard but I can't totally be sure is that people constantly wonder who Carly Simon was singing about in "You're So Vain." But how come nobody ever wonders which song Elton John was talking about in "Your Song"? I suppose, like I did for a long time, people simply assume Elton John is singing about the song he's currently singing. The song he wrote is "Your Song." But that's not correct at all. The song is obviously sung from the perspective of a really awkward guy handing somebody else either a sheet of written music or a recorded track and telling them about how he wrote that song for them. But we never actually hear the song he wrote for the person. I like to imagine it's "Rocket Man."
     Another possible interpretation of this song is that the persona singing the song is just Bernie Taupin himself. He's all, "Hey, Elton. Here's another song I wrote for you. I don't mind if you tell everybody that it's your song. Go ahead and take credit for it. I don't care. I mean, I don't even remember what color your eyes are, that's how fucking chill I am. Just don't forget to pay me, darling."
     I wish there was a cut of Moulin Rouge where Nicole Kidman stands expectantly after Ewan McGregor finishes singing until he finally says, "Well? What do you think?" And then she's all, "I'm just waiting excitedly for the song you wrote for me since that obviously was just you telling me about how you wrote a song for me! I bet it's great!" And then Ewan panics and just starts singing Alice Cooper's "Roses on White Lace".
Grade: B+.


Oh Dear by Brandi Carlile
I'm not great at reviewing things because I treat every review as a discussion with another person who has experienced the thing I'm reviewing. That's because I think reviews that take care not to spoil the thing being reviewed (in the case of a book or movie) are too superficial to matter. People either want to have an in-depth discussion of experiencing the thing or want a Cliff's Note summary of the thing so they can pretend to speak on it as if they'd developed their own opinions on it. The latter reason for reading reviews probably stems from a fear of not being completely plugged in to popular culture and having to admit to somebody at some party that you haven't formulated an opinion on every single event in popular culture over the last forty years. I prefer to either have something extremely witty and precise to say about something I've personally experienced than to vomit somebody else's opinions on that thing. But I can see why people would feel they need to have an opinion on everything. And I hope you use some of the things I say in discussions while pretending you came up with them yourself. It would be so flattering!
     All that is to say this: what I'm about to say about this song, you won't understand unless you've heard the song. And even then, you might simply think, "You're an idiot, Grunion Guy." Of course if you think that, I hope you think, immediately after, that I'm thinking, "Fuck you, asshole!"
      I can't help thinking that this song plays on an endless loop in Velma's head every time Fred and Daphne go off together to "hunt for Daphne's clit." Whoops! That didn't need quotes! What I meant to say was "hunt for ghosts" as the euphemism for what I actually typed. Sorry about that! Anyway, this song is about yearning and loneliness and being scared while chasing ghosts in a van deep in the dark woods. That might not be said explicitly in the lyrics (although it comes quite close!) but the yodeling definitely comes across as setting the tone of the dark woods.
     Don't question me in that tone! I already told you what you can and can't think after reading my opinions! Anyway, the only thing I'm not sure about is if Velma is yearning for Fred or Daphne.
Rating: B.


This Song by Ookla the Mok
Unlike "Your Song" by Elton John, "This Song" is actually about this song. You can tell because when Ookla the Mok sing, "This song is over now," the song ends. When Elton John sings about the song being finished, it keeps going for two more minutes. Because he finished writing the song he sings about in "Your Song" but he never gets around to singing it.
     "This Song" simply describes "This Song" and since it's just a song about describing itself, it doesn't have a lot to say. It would be interesting if it was all, "This song will make your head explode in five days!" But it doesn't do that (thankfully! It might be interesting but I would spend the next five days terrified and possibly wrapping my head in duct tape hoping to keep it together by the end of day five (I wonder if duct tape would keep my head from exploding? I wish the Mythbusters were still around)). It just points out the song is kind of weak and short. It might house a secret message that I'm too stupid to figure out.
Grade: C-.


Be My Dark Angel by Electric Six
This song is about a guy who crosses the street to fry an egg on the face of the woman he wants to fuck. It might be the most relatable lyrics Electric Six have ever written! Especially the part about asking the lady to be his Capri Sun. I guess that means Mr. Valentine has sex by poking his penis into a woman's nether regions for five minutes until he finally gets his penis in the hole.
     This is a really progressive song because in the middle of it, he just lists all the different races of girls he'd like to have sex with. That's called being a good ally.
     If you decide to listen to this because I gave it a good grade, you should be forewarned: at one point he mentions that the Jacksons are reuniting and going on tour. This isn't true. Michael Jackson died like nine years ago. This song is from 2005 so it was probably true then. I bet Electric Six was paid good money to advertise the new Jackson 5 tour. Heck, I suppose it could be true now even though Michael is dead. It's not like he was ever part of any Jackson reunion tour anyway.
Grade: B-.


The Great American Success Story by Alice Cooper
Alice Cooper has a song called "The Man with the Golden Gun" that was almost certainly written to be the theme song for the movie. He also wrote "The Man Behind the Mask" which was used in one of the Friday the 13th movies. He wrote "Prince of Darkness" for the movie, Prince of Darkness. A movie was written based on his song "Road Rats." "I am the Future" played over the credits for Class of 1984. What I'm suggesting is that Alice Cooper has had a long history of songs being written exclusively for movies (as well as some other things I suggested that don't fit that particular argument. Sue me!). So when I first heard this song on Constrictor, I thought, "Was this song supposed to be the theme song for Rodney Dangerfield's Back to School?" Since that time, the Internet has become a thing and I could easily verify that fact. But I enjoy living in a world where I trust my own assumptions! If I think a thought, it must be true or else how could I have thought it?! Answer me that, genius!
      In one line of this song, Alice sings, "He's staring at her legs but he's thinking 'bout her face." The word that face is supposed to rhyme with is "class." I like to believe that Alice makes a huge, over-emphasized wink to the crowd when he sings this song in concert and then says, "You get what I meant to say, right?!" He loves doing that trick. In "I Love America," he sings "flirt" where he obviously means to say "fuck." I bet he winks really big when he sings that song too! What a joker this guy is!
Grade: C.


* * * * * * * * * *


Comic Book Reviews!

Strangers in Paradise XXV #4
By Terry Moore

Why does Terry Moore insist on a nearly completely black cover? Is it so every single issue will retain proof that it has been read? Unless you put on rubber gloves, you can't not wind up with greasy fingerprints all over the stupid thing!

Unless...maybe...am I just a filthy, greasy monster? Do most people wash their hands enough that they don't leave greasy prints on glossy black comic book covers?

No, you know what? I'm unasking that question. I don't want to know if I'm generally more disgusting than the rest of humanity! Besides, most of you will probably lie just to seem cleaner. I'm the only one out here speaking the truth!

Rating: I forget. All my reviews of this comic book are about the damned black back covers! Anyway, it was Strangers in Paradise. Does it need a review? Oh, fine. Katchoo, the Katchoo-looking character, finally catches up to Stephanie, the Jet-looking character. They both have rose tattoos like all the female characters in Strangers in Paradise except Francine. That means they're deadly sex monsters. Later, Tambi, the Dolph-Lundgren-looking character, returns to the story to help Katchoo destroy the last of the off-the-leash deadly sex monsters. That wasn't a rating. It was a synopsis. You get what you pay for.


* * * * * * * * * *


Kick-Ass #5
By Millar and Romita Jr.

For some unknown reason, Hit-Girl is on the cover of this issue. But she doesn't make an appearance. Does that mean Hit-Girl will save the new Kick-Ass in the final issue and somebody fucked up with the cover? Or does it mean I'm living in a reality where nothing makes any sense and nobody gives a fuck? I can't even remember if Hit-Girl had a scene in one of the previous issues. Maybe she's hunting Violencia and will just happen to wind up at the right place at the right time in the final issue. Kick-Ass is going to need some kind of deus ex machina to save the day being that Millar has put her in an unwinnable situation.

But then again, "unwinnable situations" are the hallmark of Kick-Ass comic books. They're injected into the narrative so that the Fangenders can think, "Yep! This is how these kinds of things would really go down in real life. A lone vigilante can't stand against the power and money and weapons and violence of criminal organizations! They'd totally get caught and beaten within an inch of their life, if not outright killed! Kudos to realism, Millar! Bravo!" And usually that's when Hit-Girl arrives to say, "Look at me! I'm a tween monster assassin with only the most basic of morality informing my hyper-violent tendencies! I can solve any problem and survive any situation! I'm here to remind you that this is a comic book and I'm the superhero that saves the day so that you can continue to believe all the Kick-Ass parts of the story were still quite realistic. All the comic book stuff resides in me and my ridiculousness! But it's also why I'm your favorite part! Because you don't really want to read books where the nerd in a costume gets killed living your Fangender wet dream! I'm going to stop here because I don't want to get into the creepiness index of needing your savior to be an eleven year old girl."

Grade: I'm changing this part of my review from "rating" to "grade" because I can do whatever I want. Plus it's easier to just say "C-" than to ramble for a full paragraph and then never provide any sense of how well the comic book was written or drawn. I've never been any good at that anyway. Other comic book reviewers just throw that shit in because it's tradition. "Okay. So I've summed up the story in the most boring way possible and now I should probably mention the art. It's good to say how it hinders or uplifts the tone of the script. And I should mention how well both the penciller and the inker did their jobs even if I don't really understand how a person tells who did what. Then maybe knock off a line about the colorist making things bright or gloomy or using a specific palette that worked well with the themes. After that, I'll give a cursory nod to the letterer even though nobody fucking cares about that part of the process. Then I'll give it a random number of stars out of another random number of stars, insisting that it's a fair review and completely unbiased because that's important for some reason. Inject your own bias and personality and terrifying secrets from your childhood into a comic book review?! Who would be so gauche?!"

Anyway, this comic book gets a C-.


* * * * * * * * * *


Exit Stage Left: The Snagglepuss Chronicles #6
By Russell, Stilwell, Feehan, Vazquez, Parsons, Mounts, and Campbell

Grade: A+. This comic book finally gets around to the point of the series: explaining why Snagglepuss first appeared in the Hanna-Barbera cartoons as an orange cat named Snaggletooth! I knew there'd be a point to all of the nonsensical blather Russell has been writing for the last five issues!

If you want to know the reason, you'll have to buy the collected series when it comes out as a trade paperback. I'm not going to spoil it for you! Mostly because I can't repeat all of the poetic commentary on society that Russell puts in as filler before getting to the big Snaggletooth reveal! Which I totally spoiled. But that's okay because, really, all that great filler is the real reason to read this masterpiece.


* * * * * * * * * *


Hit-Girl #5
By Lemire and Risso

I know I said I would stop buying this comic book because it was too depressingly violent for a comic book that's supposed to take place in a non-comic book world. But then I remembered it is a comic book and Hit-Girl is the one part of the Kick-Ass world that's supposed to remind the audience that it's all a comic book and also that I don't have anything better to do than to read comic books anyway. Plus it's written by Jeff Lemire and when is the last time he wrote something that made me think, "Aquaman is a fucking dick." Oh yeah! When he wrote Aquaman!

I know that sentence that began "Plus it's written by" went completely off the rails and made no sense. You don't have to remind me that I'm a terrible writer. I have to live with this legacy, you know! I think it about it all the time!

The back of the comic book reads, "The world's deadliest tween superhero is on a mission to serve justice around the globe." It could just as easily read, "The world's most tween sociopath is on a mission to satiate her lust for blood around the globe." My version might even be more accurate.


Try to remember that this is a tween girl before you start jacking off to this image, you virgin nerds. But also remember it's a fictional drawing. So maybe jerking off to it is okay? Who am I to clarify morally ambiguous gray areas?! It would be so much easier if this stuff was all clearly explained in The Bible. But instead, The Bible is all, "Hey? You guys want to read some hot father on daughter action in a cave? Don't worry! The father is drunk so he doesn't know he's totally banging his hot daughters."

20/20's "What Would You Do?" segment should do one where they leave some daughters in a cave with their father and some wine to see if they'd be all, "Whoa. Has the world ended? I need some dick so badly right now!" They should do a segment on all the stories of Genesis! "What would you do if your father was passed out naked in a tent? Would you look directly at his nakedness? Would you avert your eyes as you covered him up? Would you just mind your own fucking business and, maybe, over dinner bring up your concerns about his drinking habits?" "What would you do if 'God' asked you to kill your only child? Would you attempt to do it? Would you later write accounts of the story pretending that the child was the child that matters to your religion even though Isaac was never Abraham's 'only child' and it must have been Ismael in that story? We see your subtle manipulations of Biblical history, The Bible."

I almost said "We see your subtle manipulations of the truth" in that last sentence but I couldn't bring myself to imply that anything in The Bible is true.

Mindy currently has her foot caught in a bear trap and she's going to hack it off to escape. Because that's the only way to get out of a bear trap when you're a weak tween girl assassin. It's a weird place to begin the story if you've forgotten you were reading a comic book. The main rule of comic books is this: "Remember when comic books used to sit on a rack and not on a shelf already placed securely in Mylar with a piece of tape to stave off virgins reading the product without buying it? Well, we, the Comic Book Publishers Conglomerate of America still demand our comics be written according to the good old days. And the number one way to get kids to buy comic books is to let them know on the first couple of pages that the protagonist will be facing a super duper exciting dilemma! This dilemma must be mentioned early before the soda jerk behind the counter has time to notice and yell, 'Hey, you pesky kids! This ain't no library! Git outta here!' But that kid will drop an easy nickel on the book if those pages were exciting enough!"

I know it's a pretty lengthy rule but I didn't write it! I'm just reporting the findings of my deep cover investigation into why comic books continue to use outdated writing tropes that don't really add anything to the story being told.

Hit-Girl's super-power is the opposite of Batman's. He strikes fear into the hearts of criminals which doesn't stop crime because most of the crime isn't caused because somebody was sitting around bored and thought, "Crime would be fun! As long as no scary vigilante is out there to stop me! If there was, I'd definitely not do crime!" Most crime is crimed out of desperation and/or the need for drug money. Neither of those care about the fear of a Batman. Hit-Girl's super power is killing criminals immediately no matter what crime they've done or will do which totally stops them from doing future crimes. Once again, I'm not hear to clear up age old philosophical quandaries about morally grey aspects of living in our current reality. And since I'm not here to do that, I can only conclude that Hit-Girl is more competent at stopping crime. I almost said she's more competent at being an advocate for justice but the whole idea of justice resides in that morally gray area. I mean, is it just to kill somebody for a minor infraction of the law? Who's to say?! Not me!

You might be thinking, "What the fuck? Is Grunion Guy being paid off by the NRA now?" And I would answer, "You aren't allowed to access my list of donors, you stupid pacifist! Pew pew!"

Anyway, Hit-Girl murders a bunch of people in gory details before going off to Northern Canada and getting her foot caught in a bear trap. But not before she murders some drug lord's son which means the drug lord is going to send so many guys after her that she'll kill them all easily.

Grade: C+.


* * * * * * * * * *


New Super-man and the Justice League of China #24
By Yang, Peeples, Santorelli, and Hi-Fi

Master I-Ching tells Kenan, "Let go of the goodness that can never be. And embrace the goodness that is." Sure, it's a bit like Obi Wan's advice to Luke. Or Yoda's advice to Luke. I don't know. It was somebody's advice to Luke, I'm fairly certain. Did Luke ever go to a 12 Step planet where he learned about the wisdom to know the difference between things you can and can't control? I-Ching's wisdom is also a slight variation on forgiving not for the other person but so that you can move on. It seems sappy and overly optimistic and a bit too happy ending on the surface of it. But I think, ultimately, it represents a kind of maturity. Stop wishing things could have been different because you can't do anything about the past. Concentrate on the present good. Work on making the present good a future joy. At the very least, reconciling the past so that it doesn't poison your future can't be anything but a positive step forward. And it takes maturity to let go of the anger and resentment of things that are set in stone.

There's a lot to be said for embracing maturity. I don't mean you have to wear a suit and stop making dick jokes in reviews about terrible comic books. The World Cup just ended so let me make a World Cup analogy (this might be a first! I'm actively making a terrible analogy and about a sport I don't care about at all!): if your first reaction to contact from an opposing player is to dramatically fall to the ground and act hurt, you've yet to reach the level of maturity I'm talking about. Playing through the buffeting from the other player, or the slide tackle, or even their overly aggressive tactics to simply concentrate on your game and your actions and the things you can control seems to me the way to approach life. I feel like I did a pretty good job of getting there in the latter half of my thirties.

Maybe writing comic book reviews that use over-the-top hyperbole while spouting whiny complaints and nitpicky critiques has become the steam valve for other aspects of my life. I get all the shit out here in a fun and whimsical way so that I don't bore my drinking buddies with long-winded maudlin grumbles about never really having a father in my life or my mother's lack of attention due to her constant battle with my out-of-control sister! I've just come to accept those were things I dealt with and so what? It made me the genius I am today!

Grade: B-.


* * * * * * * * * *


Facebooking with Grunion Guy!

On this week's episode, "World Emoji Day!"




* * * * * * * * * *


The End Part!

Speaking of Facebook, it's the ultimate modern dramatic monologue. All these people out there not realizing how everything they say is simply exposing their inner hearts. And then they don't want anybody calling them out on it because that's mean and uncivil. I have no problem saying, explicitly, what I think and feel. If somebody feels uncomfortable saying what they think and feel because they know they're going to be called out on it, maybe they should work out why those ideas anger people. Maybe they should stop viewing the world as intolerant of their terrible beliefs and start viewing themselves as intolerant people. Embrace that shit, you monster! It would be much easier to debate somebody who says what they think instead of all these cowards trying to debate about some weird, vague analogy that doesn't quite approach their real positions because they know those positions are terrible.

We can't have an honest conversation about systemic racial bias in the justice system if the people who think the justice system is fine think that because they're also racially biased but will never admit to it. You can't just respond to police taking the justice system into their own hands and murdering people instead of apprehending them by saying things like, "Don't do anything wrong and you'll be okay," or "Not all cops!" We see what you're really saying when you do because cops don't just kill people committing crimes. And even if they did only kill people committing crimes or trying to run from police, isn't that a fucking problem all on its own?! Who is out here thinking cops should have the right to administer the death penalty simply because a person suspected of a crime runs? Or gets confused over multiple police yelling instructions at them? Or disrespects a cop because the cop is being an aggressive abuser of his power? Just believing that any of that is okay makes you a terrible person in my eyes. Keep defending bullshit, my Facebook Fra Lippo Lippi. We see you, motherfucker.

Later, jerkos!

Thursday, September 24, 2026

Eee! Tess Ate Chai Tea: The Newsletter #31 (First Week of July 2018)

E!TACT #31
Super Sons Love Dynomutt #1, Aquaman Loves Jabberjaw #1, Black Lightning Loves Hong Kong Phooey #1, Flash Loves Speed Buggy #1, and Letters to Me!
By Grunion Guy

COMIC BOOK REVIEWS!

Super Sons Love Dynomutt #1 (May 30th, 2018)
By Tomasi, Pasarin, Albert, and Eltaeb

I may be caught up on Batman and his lack of honeymoon cat pussy but I'm so far behind on my weekly comics that I'm considering the terrible idea of doing haiku reviews for all the comics currently in my stack. The problem with that is that haikus in English are not beautiful and rarely interesting. Any form of poetry that can be done by somebody who counts syllables on their fingers is not a form of poetry worth reading. Again, though, I'm speaking purely of haikus in English. The reason haikus in Japanese are beautiful and interesting are that all of their syllables are basically the same length.

Some people might argue with me that a syllable is a syllable is a syllable but then I'd rebut that argument with an asshole is an asshole is an asshole.

Anyway, I'm not doing the haiku thing. But I really should think of some way to shorten the amount of time it takes to review each comic book. I have done limericks before. Those are also short, like haikus, but they're tougher to write. Not because it's harder to rhyme a few words than to count to seventeen but because limericks should be witty. It could take a little time to think up a good twist in the limerick's final line whereas I can whip up a haiku in fifteen seconds. It won't be any good but then how would that differentiate it from any other haiku?!

Ha ha! I just zinged haikus! Take that, you pretentious style of poetry!

Here are a couple of classic limericks I wrote for Superman:

Jimmy Olsen was murdered last issue,
So Superman needed a tissue.
He pulled out his cock,
And jerked off in a sock,
Screaming, "Jimmy, my pal, how I miss you!"

It turned out Jim was not really dead.
"We knew it!" the fanboys all said.
Some posted smart theories,
Amidst genial queries,
But mostly they snorted and meh'd.

Those are pretty good, right? They're better than some of the classics. Like these:

There was an old man from Nantucket,
Whose cock was so long he could suck it;
He said with a grin,
As he wiped off his chin,
'If my ear was a cunt I could fuck it.'

There was an old lady from Grott,
Who lived on green apples and snot;
When she couldn't get these,
She lived on the cheese
She scraped from the end of her twat.

Gross. Anyway. I guess maybe I should just read this stupid comic book that I bought simply because really young me loved Blue Falcon and Dynomutt. I even had the boring board game. It was so boring that I almost called it a "bored" game before I thought better of that dumb joke and punished myself by punching myself in the face simply because I thought of it.

Have you ever punched yourself so hard in the face that you see stars? The trick is to surprise yourself otherwise you'll pull the punch. "But how do I do that, Grunion Guy?" you rightly ask. "Well, what you do is," I explain patiently to the obvious dum-dums who have never punched themselves so hard in the face that they've seen stars, "You agree to ride as a passenger in a convertible owned by a guy who can't drive. So when he takes an insane corner, you forget the top is down and you quickly reach up to grab the roof to steady yourself. Being that the roof isn't there, you punch yourself hard in the face! Ta da!"

The issue begins with Dynomutt's secret origin. Basically he grew old and was about to die so Blue Falcon put robot parts in him. For some reason, those parts didn't just keep him alive. They also allowed his legs to grow really long and gave him the ability to talk. I guess Blue Falcon cut him open and thought, "While I'm in here...!"

After that, Clark, Lois, and Jon go to a funeral.


Who bukkaked Archie in his casket?

I mean, "There once was a man known as Archie,
Whose dead body we all had to see,
One viewer was horny,
And not quite so mourny,
So he taught us all how to bukkake."

That might have sounded disrespectful and insulting but, in my defense, I have no idea what vitiligo is. So I couldn't have been making fun of it. Whatever it is. Who knows? Not me!

Rating: It's hard to get the entirety of one story into one limerick but I'm going to try by generalizing the plot into non-existence! Here we go:

Blue Falcon dies at the end,
But before that, the story does wend,
Not much is said,
And then Falcon is dead.
Surprise! Blue Falcon winds up on the mend!

* * * * * * * * * *

Aquaman Loves Jabberjaw #1 (May 30th, 2018)
By Abnett, Parker, Pelletier, Kolins, Hennessy, Beredo, and McCaig

Hopefully this story is about a rash of shark attack victims across landlocked states of the USA. "Who could possibly be behind these horrible atrocities?" thinks Aquaman as he watches a great white shark shred on the drums. "How the fuck does he manage that double bass?! Wicked!"

Hmm. Apparently I wasn't too far off on Aquaman's investigative technique.


The King of the Sea: "Hey, land person. Anything going on in the ocean I should know about?!"

Strange shark sightings have been reported in Amnesty Bay. They're not strange because the shark shouldn't be feeding in the bay but because the shark is super friendly and rocks people's socks off. So it sounds like it's a situation that desperately needs the attention of a member of the Justice League. You don't want too many people having a pleasant encounter with a great white shark. What if they begin to think all great whites are friendly?!

Now I'm beginning to wonder if maybe this is an allegory about the rise of white supremacy in the United States of America.

Aquaman meets up with Jabberjaw to discover he's just a big Rodney Dangerfield/Lou Costello/Curly wannabe. So maybe I was too quick to assume political commentary in a Hanna-Barbera/DC mashup comic book.


Poor white conservatives can't even read a relaxing Aquaman Loves Jabberjaw comic book without being subtly criticized!

Did I say "subtly criticized"? Apparently I'm better at reading comic books than I first realized (and, believe me, I realized I was great at it almost immediately! I ain't no humble pair of titties!) because this absolutely is a comic book about white supremacy. Man. Now I'm just depressed. I was hoping I was going to escape reality for a few minutes and just read the innocent story of a great white shark banging human groupies.

I mean, seriously, Dan Abnett. Can't you keep your liberal agenda to yourself?! This is so uncivil, criticizing Trumpers right here in a comic book that should be free of politics! How am I, an ultra-liberal tool of communism, supposed to enjoy a book that skewers racist, misogynistic, anti-sea-life bastards?! Oh wait! I just realized what I typed! This is terrific! For a second there, I thought I was a white male conservative who gets super defensive whenever somebody points out that our country is being dismantled by white male conservatives and then writes posts on Facebook like "Both sides aren't being very civil! Stop attacking people that I identify with and pointing out that maybe some of my thoughts and ideas are problematic and gross! Jerks!"

In the end, Aquaman realizes that people only respond to propaganda and mind control so he teaches Jabberjaw's band, The Neptunes, to use aqua-telepathy to brainwash the masses into being cool to each other. Wait a second. Is that a good message? Is Dan Abnett's message actually the opposite of what I thought?! Is he a conservative criticizing the entertainment industry for espousing liberal views to make the world a better place?! I'm confused!

I wish this story had just been about a shark fucking the ladies.

There's a Captain Caveman story in the end that points out how punching Nazis goes way back. Way, way, way back. So far way back that we just have to accept that Nazis need to be punched. You can't spend your life not punching Nazis?! I mean, what can you do?! It's right there in a comic book!

Rating: I think this book was so liberal that every conservative who read it immediately began boycotting DC comic books and burned their Action Comics #1 to own the libtards. Although, was it too liberal? I mean, the plot revolves around a racist Ocean Master who is obviously a stand-in for racist conservative Americans. But then his whole anti-sea-life mission is being financed by a liberal, anti-human agenda! The fucking liberals are behind it all to make white males look bad! And in the end, the only way to get the liberal message across to the world is to sink it into their brains with telepathic pop songs, essentially brainwashing them into compliance! I think this is one of those "both-sides-ism" things! Poor Jabberjaw being exploited by Dan Abnett for his confusing political agenda!

* * * * * * * * * *

Black Lightning Loves Hong Kong Phooey #1 (May 30th, 2018)
By Hill, Parker, Cowan, Sienkiewicz, Kolins, Cox, and Avina

I can't explain what it was because I was seven but I fell in love with Scatman Crothers. I couldn't get enough of him. I wanted him to be my father and my best friend. It was partially due to my weird childhood fetishization of old men. Going in Style was one of my all time favorite movies. I loved anything with Art Carney in it. I adored George Burns. I thought of my first grade speech therapy teacher, an old man, as my best friend. I used to bother my old male neighbor to go on walks around the block with me. And when I realized Scatman Crothers was a person that existed when I first saw Scavenger Hunt, it was love at first sight. Not romantic love, of course! I wasn't sexual yet! Jesus! Stop sexualizing seven year olds, you gross perv!

Anyway, what I'm trying to say is I loved Scatman Crothers (and Art Carney! But he has nothing to do with this so forget about him now!). I also loved Hong Kong Phooey. Those of you familiar with Hong Kong Phooey know where this is going. See, he was voiced by Scatman Crothers. Maybe that's why I fell in love with him. Maybe I subconsciously recognized the voice. I'm not sure when I learned Scatman gave voice to Phooey (it's not like it's hard to figure out. It's not like Scatman put on a different cartoon voice for the gig!) but I'm sure I met the realization with a heart-eyed, "Ohhhhhh!"

I also really loved Roddy McDowall. He was right around fifty at the time my old man fetish was developing, so he probably fits. He also played that aging horror host in Fright Night which played into the whole weird obsession I had. But this doesn't fit into the narrative I'm developing either. I only brought it up because I loved him so much! He was also in Scavenger Hunt. Maybe I just loved everybody in that movie because I had a bit of a thing for Richard Mulligan too.

If you're a young person, you just had to Google about ten different people and movies.

Um, anyway, what I'm trying to say is DC Comics picked the line-up of Hanna-Barbera cartoon tie-ins this month directly out of my brain. Dynomutt and Blue Falcon, Jabberjaw and the Neptunes, and Hong Kong Phooey were three of my favorite cartoons. And Black Lightning was one of my first favorite DC comic book characters thanks to Batman and the Outsiders, one of the first comic book series I began picking up when I discovered my first local comic book shop in Santa Clara, Brian's Books. So for me, this is the team up of the millennia!

Not to toot my own horn (although it would be irresponsible and gross to toot somebody else's horn without consent (also, tooting my own horn isn't a euphemism for something gross that shouldn't be done in public (but even if it was, I just stated that I wasn't tooting my own horn (even if the point of saying "not to toot my own horn" means you're just about to toot your own horn)))) but I've now forgotten what I was going to say after all those parenthetical references. Oh, I remember the toot: I spelled "millennia" correctly on the first try!

Rating: It was underwhelming. So underwhelming that I don't even want to discuss it. But I did really enjoy one panel from the Funky Phantom back-up story!


Gouverneur Morris doesn't get enough love! Glad to see my favorite founding father mentioned!

* * * * * * * * * *

Flash Loves Speed Buggy #1 (May 30th, 2018)
By Lobdell, Booth, Rapmund, Irwin, Livesay, Banning, Deering, and Dalhouse

Even though I can do a lousy Speed Buggy impression, I didn't get this comic book because of my nostalgic love of the cartoon. I got it because I hate myself and realized I hadn't read a Lobdell comic in quite some time. Plus this comic has the added bonus of Brett Booth's drawings of gigantic thighs!

Before I explain how this issue begins, I want everybody to take a deep breath. You might want to sit down. Maybe have a cool glass of water handy. I don't want you to be too shocked at how this Scott Lobdell story begins. Are you prepared to read the first line of the story? No, no! Don't try to guess what it might be! You might strain yourself! Okay, are you prepared? Here it comes...


I know, right!? You probably thought it was going to begin "My name is Superboy."

Just be thankful I didn't scan the picture of Wally West because it's 85% thigh. It's really disturbing. Maybe not as disturbing as the writing though.


Scott Lobdell is so terrible at writing that he doesn't realize that words in speech bubbles aren't read by other characters but are meant to indicate spoken words.

I know that the previous panel is supposed to be funny. We're supposed to laugh and think, "The Flash just said what I was thinking! How do you pronounce that?!" But really only awful comic book fans who have somehow been deluded into thinking Scott Lobdell writes decent comic books will not immediately think, "You just heard how he pronounces it, you stupid fuck. Also, how do you know there's a percentage sign in his name? Unless it's pronounced 'Kilgpercentagesignre.' In which case, we're back to the first point and you just learned how to pronounce it. You stupid fuck."

Speed Buggy shows up because his name is on the cover. What?! You need more reason than that? You did see Lobdell's name on the cover, right? You should know better if you saw Lobdell's name on the cover and you expected a coherent story that was entertaining for people who aren't concerned with remaking The Last Jedi.

Speed Buggy picks up The Flash and they drive up Kilg%re's asshole. I don't think I'm making that up. It's possible I'm reading too much into the story. I'd know for sure if it wasn't for Brett Booth's terrible panel layouts, his flaming raccoon turd art (that probably reads as "kinetic" for the people who enjoy this shit and who are also developmentally arrested at age twelve), and the incomprehensibility of Scott Lobdell's "I don't give a fuck about this story as long as I get paid, bitches!" storytelling ability.

Inside Kilg%re's colon, Speed Buggy and Wally West encounter the Speed Force. Luckily the Speed Force is such nonsensical bullshit that it should be right up Lobdell's plot alley.

Speed Buggy and The Flash defeat Kilg%re by saying a bunch of scientific words. It doesn't really matter because, according to Brett Booth's seizure inducing visuals, I almost died reading it. But I'm back in my chair and my head is bandaged so I'm ready to keep reading. I don't dare reread the previous bit so I'm just going to have to assume that there's a reason for Wally West to be turning against Speed Buggy's driver now. I think it might have had to do with a rail of coke and an upskirt shot.


There's so much terrible stuff to rant about in a Scott Lobdell story with Brett Booth art that I probably shouldn't stop to point out that these jerkos typed "well-intetioned." I probably shouldn't but I'm a terribly petty asshole.

It turns out the guy driving Speed Buggy is the smartest scientist in the world. That's one of three characters Scott Lobdell knows how to write. The other two are "teenager who wants to fuck the person he's beating up" and "sassy teenager that talks directly to the reader as he comments on his own story in an omnipresent manner." I almost said one of his characters was a baton twirling passerby who knows more about the plot than Green Arrow but that was one of Ann Nocenti's.

Doctor Veritas's male counterpart, Doctor Blanc, explains to Wally West that science can do whatever it wants so go fuck yourself, goody-two-shoes! He also calls the multiverse the "omniverse" which is Scott Lobdell's trademark. I can't help but wonder why editors never tell him to stop using that term since nobody in the DC Universe calls it the Omniverse. Unless they're in a Scott Lobdell story. You would think more continuity nerds would be up in arms about this but I guess they're all too busy writing terribly punctuated essays about how Tom King is ruining Batman.

The idiotic editors also allow Brett Booth to put more of those stupid fucking Pizza Fish advertisements into the story. What the fuck do Scott Lobdell and Brett Booth have on the editors at DC?! Why can't the editors tell them to knock off the junior high school shenanigans!? This is a professional field of artistic work, isn't it?!

I mean, I guess it isn't because Booth and Lobdell have been allowed careers in comic booking.

Rating: Look. I couldn't keep writing about this shit. Once again, Lobdell writes a terrible time travel story. Time travel stories are great for writers who don't understand how to write stories. Nobody needs any motivation because they get their motivation from somebody in the future changing things. Then the hero's only motivation is to return things to normal. It's like a shortcut to a plot. In this story, The Flash has to defeat Savitar who changed time to allow him to rule the world. But The Flash says, "Oh yeah?! Two can play at that game!" Then he and Speed Buggy change time back so that Savitar doesn't rule the world. Meanwhile, nobody else notices that anything happened.

Scott Lobdell is the worst.

* * * * * * * * * *

Letters to Me!

I Wrote (about Anonymous!): "But I refused to explain the magic trick and instead just continued to boggle at his inability to understand exaggeration for effect and obvious bias disguised as impartial critique."

Anonymous Replied: "It's mind-boggling that you'd try justifying the drivel that you write, especially considering it's not as clever or witty as you like to believe."

I Wrote (about Anonymous!): Not that I should be surprised by that response and then insult their learning disability that I'm sure they've been struggling with for years when the whole point of my reviews is that they're supposed to sound like an arrogant yet somewhat stupid asshole who doesn't know how to write reviews!

Anonymous Replied: "Given the state of your writing, it's odd that you of all people would make fun of learning disabilities. Even more, your argument falls flat considering the fact that you actually are biased and conceited. The fact you let crap by Steve Orlando get a pass, a guy whose JLA comics makes Cullen Bunn's Lobo series seem like Oscar-worthy material in comparison, speaks volumes. Bunn's Lobo was mediocre at best, even if it departs further than Bennet's, but Orlando's take was horrible. And the sad part is you haven't even refuted what I had said in terms of the state of Lobo within the DCU - the character's no better than how he was when the New 52 version debuted. At least when Bennet had been writing there seemed to be potential for something interesting. Hopefully Scott Snyder will do a better job."

My Reply: I wonder if Anonymous watched a magician saw a woman in half, he'd start an argument with the guy about how the guy didn't really saw the woman in half. Then when the magician explains the trick and says, "Yeah, see, it's a trick, buddy. I didn't really expect anybody to believe I could actually saw a woman in half," Anonymous would say, "Oh, nice try, pretending you didn't really want me to believe you sawed the woman in half! Your argument that you didn't really expect me to believe it falls flat because you did the trick expecting I'd believe it!" Or something like that. Maybe I'm terrible at terrible analogies because of my learning disability.

Anyway, Anonymous's problem is that he's unwilling to step away from his initial conceit about my arrogance and bias. I just told him the trick and explained the voice I use in writing my blogs and he refuses to accept it.

Me: "I'm supposed to sound like an arrogant yet somewhat stupid asshole who doesn't know how to write reviews."
Anonymous: "That argument falls flat because you're an arrogant yet somewhat stupid asshole who doesn't know how to write reviews!"

Anonymous Writes (in response to my suggestion that Rogol Zaar reminds me of Lobo): There are plenty of characters with pale skin and skull belt buckles, even outside of comics.

My Reply:



* * * * * * * * * *
And that's all I have time for! I mean, that's all the time I want to spend on this thing! Later, jerkos!

Monday, September 7, 2026

Eee! Tess Ate Chai Tea: The Newsletter #64 (September 2026)

E!TACT #64
Lanterns Review, Maximum Overdrive Review, and Trucks Review
By Grunion Guy


Lanterns, A Review
The new HBO show about the Green Lanterns asks the most important question that can be asked about the space cop organization created in 1959: "How many of the decisions of a sentient, mostly inanimate object are informed by systemic racism?" I don't mean that as a cynical criticism at all! It's obviously a great question because the backdrop of the show is Earth but particularly America where we should be asking that question of ourselves every day. Not because we're looking to feel awful or shame ourselves (and others which can be a lot of fun so we should be careful about how and why we do it but that discussion should be saved for an essay on some Spider-man franchise) but because we should constantly be moving ourselves toward being better people creating a better country so that our children can have a better future. Most people don't want to ask questions like that which is why a dumb show about comic book characters needs to ask it multiple times right in your face in the third episode.

Hidden behind that question and eagerly vying for your attention is the next big question the show asks (which is the question that has been asked for decades by Hal Jordan himself): How can a space police force run by little blue aliens whose concept of ethics, order, and morality are so foreign to not just human beings but every single other alien species in the entire universe know what is best for everybody? How can not it not become (assuming it didn't actually start out this way) a fascist, authoritarian regime demanding an infinite variety of people and cultures all act in accordance with their will and using their supreme belief in their will (and will itself) to justify the violence their Corps enacts?

So, you know, they, at least, have that in common with our police force in America (and probably other countries but since few other countries espouse the belief that plurality is what makes us great and then to have a police force that uses that plurality as an excuse to arrest and beat and murder the non-whites compromising a good percentage of that plurality (and because I live in America), I'm less concerned with how other countries do it right now).

But Hal Jordan does not believe that Green Lives Matter. He would never be caught dead with an American flag with a putrid green line replacing one of the other lines as if members of the Green Lantern Corps somehow are a special class of American that deserves unconditional support for absolutely no Goddamned good reason. Hal Jordan questions authority. And, sure, Hal Jordan also is want to run into a situation with green fists blazing, using violence to enact order, he usually does so for the right reasons. It's why Kyle Chandler's constantly talking about his gut and his instincts in the show. Usually, I'm whatever the opposite is of a proponent of cops using their guts and instincts (oh! It's "opponent", isn't it! I'm an opponent to cops who think their gut feelings are accurate and believe intuition is evidence!). But this is a comic book series where Hal Jordan is the actual Main Character because stories are allowed to have Main Characters whereas real life does not have Main Characters because people who act like Main Characters are actually NPC douchebags. Hal Jordan does the right thing with an inherent knowledge of the right thing that is (mostly) infallible because he is the good guy and the hero. I say "mostly" because he also still has things to learn from younger generations and Black artists who also need to learn things because they (the Black artist in question here is John Stewart) have things to learn about strictly following authoritative forces and acting on orders without thinking.

Speaking of John Stewart (who is maybe the actual Main Character of this show (which is also wrong because the show is called Lanterns which is plural indicating more than one main character exists (two for sure but possibly three and maybe four, depending on how much Sinestro will play apart and how often Guy Gardner will be allowed to steal the spotlight in every scene he winds up being in)), this might be the first time that I'm fine with Stewart's background being that of a Marine. I always hated that his character somehow morphed from an architect to a soldier. But in this case, they give him the architectural bent (less subtly going for the "art" part of it than the "building" part of it which I always thought was fairly clever (also making him an artist, and making him extremely competent with the ring in ways even Hal seems impressed by, might be an indication that there's no place for Kyle Rayner in this show which could upset some people but I'm fine with)) along with the soldiering bit. And I don't mind it because we see a man that was raised by a strong authoritarian voice using the promise of a better life after his normal one just so of going with the flow of the whole military mindset. His parents lie to him to get him to do what they want. The military lies to him to get him to do what they want. And now the Guardians are lying to him to get him to do what they want. Stewart, being a smart chocolate chip cookie (as opposed to a smart cracker which is what Hal would be if he were smart), has already sensed the downfalls of listening to authoritarians. He lost everything when the military used him to clean up their (and Hal Jordan's!) mess. He wound up a child back in his parents' home where he was never really happy except when drawing. His mother finally sees what they've done to him by forcing him to do what they say because of a vague Christian hope for an unbelievable life after the current life he's living if he just behaves and acts in a proper manner. She relents and helps him get into art school.

This first series has Hal and John hunting down a Manhunter which, I mean, a bit on the nose if you wanted a naming convention to absolutely Other an alien on Earth. But it's really about John learning that orders should be questioned and Hal learning that other people can be trusted to be competent and brave and heroic too. But Hal probably won't learn the lesson that he doesn't have to go down in flames like his father did just to prove something to himself and others because we already saw in the first episode how his story will end. But maybe it ends that way because he does the learn the lesson, right? That's almost certainly the story being told. And John will take over but he'll have been genuinely corrupted by Hal (in a good way by helping John to realize cops, even space cops, are awful people!) so that the Guardians will be all, "FUCKING HAL JORDAN! YOU DUMB PIECE OF SHIT! YOU RUINED ARE SUPER COMPETENT GREEN LANTERN PUPPET!"

Anyway, those are my thoughts on the show after four episodes. I really fucking like it a lot and Kyle Chandler couldn't be a better Hal Jordan. And Aaron Pierre is one fine John Stewart ("fine" being defined as excellent and so fucking hot). Plus during the first episode, the sheriff tells Hal to "eat shit" which is surely something Tom King demanded be in the first script as a shout-out to my web page, right?! Sure, it would have been better if the sheriff had spelled out the word shit ("Eat s-h-i-t, Hal!" she would have said while turning and winking at the camera) but then maybe it would have been too obvious, right?!

* * * * * * * * * *

Maximum Overdrive, A Review
This movie is terrible. I suppose that's a criticism but maybe not the criticism you think it is because it isn't unwatchable. It's especially watchable when you know Stephen King directed it at his peak cocaine-fueled frenzy and that Stephen King is not a movie director and also that the cocaine probably had something to do with his belief that he was. The dialogue is shit. The acting is awful. The reason that everybody remembers the goblin face on the front of the toy truck semi is because it was the actor who could emote the best in the entire film. That might not be a fair statement because Yeardley Smith actually blows everybody else out of the acting waters. She somehow plays the new wife who totally loves her husband but realizes he's capable of doing really stupid shit and needs to be screamed at occasionally while also never holding it against him in the way bitter, resentful wives of idiotic sitcom husbands always seem to do. Like, why are they married to that idiot if they obviously hate him so much? But Yeardley Smith obviously loves her big stupid new husband who won't stop risking his life for the stupidest of reasons.

The best part of the movie which I didn't totally realize was the best part of the movie (but suspected it was) until I watched Trucks (we'll get to that soon enough!) several days later was that it didn't take itself seriously at all and knew it was a kind of campy movie that was going to act stupid and irreverent for about an hour and a half. Yes, I did laugh at the bank marquee simply displaying, "Fuck" and "You" over and over again. I liked when the ATM called Stephen King an asshole and then when he, dumbfounded, had to report back to his wife that the ATM called him an asshole. I probably laughed at a bunch of stuff that wasn't supposed to be as funny as it was (or funny at all?) like when the hitchhiking lady lead first meets Emilio Estevez and says, "Hey! You're kinda cute!" (Sorry. I don't remember her exact quote so my brain stole a quote from Schoolhouse Rock.) Estevez responds with some sort of laughing "Oh yeah?" response (I don't remember! I wasn't planning on reviewing this when I watched it!) and she replies, "Not that cute." It was stupid. And sort of cute. And absolutely fucking ridiculous because, like, trucks were killing people and shit. Maybe they didn't know that yet but I think at least that goblin truck was acting super suspicious!

I'm not a huge AC/DC fan because I feel like most of their songs just sound too similar. So it's fine to hear one AC/DC song (doesn't matter which one, really!) while listening to other songs because it's not too much AC/DC. It's just enough! The radio is all, "Here's some music by a bunch of rock stars which makes you think they all only had two or three songs because we refuse to play any deep cuts at all ever! And now here's one by AC/DC. Probably 'You Shook Me All Night Long' but does it matter?!" Anyway, I bring it up because having AC/DC due the entire soundtrack is another consequence of putting piles and piles of cocaine up your schnozz. My favorite AC/DC song is "Who Made Who" which was basically the theme song for this movie. It's also kind of the line yelled at the trucks at least five times by the waitress of the diner as she freaks out, constantly storming outside to yell, "We made you! WE MADE YOU!" So the question was sort of answered long before the song played at the end of the movie. Unless the song was supposed to bring into question the waitress's declaration!

True story: the hottest and loudest concert that I ever attended was AC/DC at the Cow Palace in San Francisco. I left that show dehydrated and deaf. It was fucking awesome!

One last AC/DC fact: at the beginning of the movie when the bridge decides to lift itself, a black VW Bus with AC/DC's logo on the side gets caught up in the chaos. It was so cool! I don't even like AC/DC that much but I wanted it so badly! Stupid Stephen King destroyed it though.

By the end of the movie, way more people than I've ever seen in a disaster movie like this survive. It's kind of uplifting! Most disaster or horror movies are all, "Here are the couple of people who you're supposed to care about. Nobody else matters but these few people who will survive." But this movie is all, "You know all those truckers whose trucks turned on them? Most of them are going to live! Can you believe it? There's like twenty people on that little sailboat at the end!" The final victim, a glorious death by the goblin truck, claims Tom Nuttal from Deadwood because he's too greedy. But then Billy the Kid blows the goblin truck up with a rocket grenade and then he probably fucks the hitchhiker. Again!

Yeah, I guess there's a romantic subplot in this thing where Emilio Estevez and Laura Harrington (the hitchhiker who thinks he's cute!) where they're constantly fucking each other in the back bedroom of the diner whenever there's any downtime? It's fucking weird. Especially when the kid who has survived on his wits by hiding from homicidal ice cream trucks and killer lawn mowers walks in on them because Emilio is needed for some reason. That reason is that he somehow becomes the leader. Maybe because he's an ex-con? At least it makes more sense than if, say, Timothy Busfield were the leader of the group! Can you imagine that? Actually, you don't have to because the movie Trucks exists!

* * * * * * * * * *

Trucks (and One Helicopter), A Review
This movie is terribler than Maximum Overdrive. I know I should have written "more terrible" but that doesn't quite grasp how majestically terrible this movie is. The motto for this movie is probably the motto that the First Lady really wanted to use: "Be Terriblest".

Somewhere in Hollywood in the late mid-90s, some executive was asking the question, "What if we remade Maximum Overdrive but took it more seriously?" Too bad there wasn't an executive in the same place and time willing to kick that executive in the balls. I haven't looked into the reasons Trucks exists but it could be because Stephen King got involved and wanted to see his short story done right. Like how he couldn't abide Kubrick's The Shining existing without his own official version of it. What's especially weird about how serious this movie takes itself is that it may have made me laugh even more than Maximum Overdrive. Oh, it didn't want me laughing. But I was laughing. I was laughing at it and not with it. Because, deep down, I'm a bully and an asshole.

Timothy Busfield appears onscreen near the beginning and nobody who didn't see his name on the poster thinks, "Oh! There's our leading man! The guy who looks like he invented the idea of being a clown without make-up." At least when I saw Emilio Estevez, I knew with whom I was dealing! "That there's one of them good lookers! He's probably going to be the one to save the day by being all, 'I know how to sail a boat! We can go to an island to escape the trucks even though our movie is more about all technology turning on people and not just trucks!' Also he's going to bang the '80s hot lead actress!" Now that I'm thinking about Maximum Overdrive's weird romantic subplot again, it makes me think of Trucks weird romantic subplot which makes me realize the Maximum Overdrive romantic subplot wasn't weird at all! It was just the regular old male gaze '80s romantic subplot where if a woman entered the picture, she definitely wanted to fuck the male protagonist. Like, immediately. But in Trucks, the romantic subplot involves teenagers who constantly look at each other like they're about to learn the definition of "awkward finger blasting". Their relationship is so weird and strained but seemingly inevitable that it actually works for the big surprise ending when Logan hugs Abby in the helicopter and she's basically comatose. He's all, "Abby! It's me, Logan! I'm going to hug you like I haven't done all movie but we both knew we wanted t!" She just stares into the void of despair because she already knows the surprise ending. But while I was watching it, I just thought, "Typical Abby! Totally emotionally unavailable!" But then Timothy Busfield moves the curtain away from the helicopter cockpit (a thing that doesn't really exist? Right?) to reveal that Abby's father isn't piloting it at all! The helicopter which isn't a truck is sentient too! And it's got the four survivors you knew were supposed to survive in its belly! OH NO!

One of the bits I found pretty funny in this movie was how phones and televisions weren't working due to, I don't know, a chemical explosion or a comet or something, but whenever the people in the diner needed a little expository clear-headedness, the television would go from static to a live news report giving out needed details to understand what's going on. I guess the television only showing them what it wanted to show them was a hint that it wasn't just the trucks that had turned?

Trucks contains a number of scenes that are references to Maximum Overdrive. Obviously, they couldn't ignore that this film had already been made but for the big screen and with a better budget and, well, I guess I ran out of things that were better about the film. Some of the minor references I appreciated were when the guy was playing pinball but doesn't get killed by it because he kills it first by tilting it and when they show the cook using an electric knife that doesn't turn on him and cut his arm so that he goes crazy and begins screaming at every piece of electronics, "WE MADE YOU!"

I don't remember anything about the soundtrack of this movie so AC/DC wins that comparison.

The married couple in this movie aren't cute like Yeardley Smith and her man. They're fucking annoying and they fuck but we don't get to see any titties or dicks or asses because this was made for television, I guess? Even though it's rated R? They both die. Also the two truckers at the diner die. Plus the cook dies. Everybody dies except Timothy Busfield and his waitress, Hope (although by the end non-proper noun hope does die!), Logan (Busfield's son), and Abby the rebellious teenager. Oh, also the hippie dude dies saving Abby so part of her comatose persona at the end was formed when she got him killed because she answered a ringing phone that was just a trap set by the trucks. Was that part a joke? That the teenage girl couldn't resist answering a telephone?! I couldn't tell because I had no idea why she needed to answer the phone so badly.

Maybe it was supposed to be a joke because there's one scene that had to have been put in for laughs which is weird because the movie really tries to be taken seriously: the scene where the mailman is killed by a toy truck. It's basically a cartoon moment. If a guy can get his head exploded by a toy truck that wasn't even the solid metal Tonka kind of toy truck but an obviously lightweight piece of shit, he fucking deserved to die. Maybe that was a reference to Maximum Overdrive as well where so many people in that movie deserved to die because how do you get killed by a soda pop machine blasting sodas out of its fuck chute? Just step one foot to the side, jerkos! Also some lady we see hanging out a second story window was strangled by the cord of her hair dryer? So the machines don't just have control of their functions but any part of them? Or did the lady just go, "Oh no! My blow dryer has turned up from warm to hot and it's uncomfortable! I don't want to live!" and then she strangled herself?

The main thing this movie made me ask was: "How did Timothy Busfield become such a huge star in the '80s and '90s? Were all of us on cocaine? Like fluoride in the water?! Do I now believe in chemtrails?!" The non-main thing it made me ask was, "Why was this made?"

I just read the Trucks wiki to see if it would explain why the movie was made but it didn't. What it did do was make me realize I'm a fucking shit reviewer because this quote from Rob Dean of Daily Grindhouse was pretty good: "The constant attempt to ground the story in a "logical" explanation - mostly delivered by a TV set that shouldn't work but does, and only gets the exposition channel - undercuts the fact that this could just be a goofy thing with some menace that people would overanalyze on the Internet 20 years later." Also 30 years later, Dean!

Sunday, September 6, 2026

Eee! Tess Ate Chai Tea: The Newsletter #30 (Fourth Week of June 2018)

E!TACT #30
Robin vs. Ra's al Ghul #1, Nightwing vs Hush #1, Batgirl vs the Riddler #1, Red Hood vs Anarky #1, Harley Quinn vs The Joker #1, Batman #50, and Letters to Me!
By Grunion Guy

COMIC BOOK REVIEWS!

Robin vs Ra's al Ghul #1
By Seeley, Walker, Hennessey, Gray, and Bellaire

There's a line at the beginning of this book where Selina Kyle says to Damian Wayne, "I thought I was going to have to jump in and save that guy from being force-fed his own pins." Do I even need to say what I first read that as? If I do, you must be new to my reviews! Welcome! For you, I'll say it: I thought "pins" was "penis"! Part of me likes to think, "Tim Seeley did that on purpose. What a genius!" The other part of me is thinking, "Why are you reading comic books when your country is being burned to the ground by liars and despots?" But then that's exactly why I'm reading comic books, isn't it?!

Robin decides to have his own bachelor party (what do you call the thing the son of the groom gets up to the night before the wedding? If I had to rely on my own experience of my dad's third marriage, I would believe everybody simply played Infocom games all night after refusing to go to the wedding because they didn't want to dress up) which consists of sneaking into an arcade and playing a game called Cheese Viking. What he actually does is fight some guy named Aion who looks like Catwoman with her tits bound. I'm not going to look up "aion" to see what it means in whatever language it's from. I'm just going to assume it means "I'm your stepmother with her tits bound."

For some reason I'm not going to think too deeply about, I took a break to masturbate after that last sentence.

Aion. I suppose it could also be defined as "offspring of a bat and a cat but from a different timeline than the one you think." So basically he's probably Damian Wayne's half-brother from another time mother. I mean, his costume is Catwoman's suit with a red and green feathered cape. Imagine his identity issues! "Am I a bird? Am I a cat? Am I Batman?!"

Aion does reveal that he's Selina and Bruce's kid. Two pages later, they aren't sucking each other's dicks. I checked because I really felt ready for another "break." You'll see in the Letters to Me! section how I admit that I would be a poor caretaker of the Star Wars franchise. Same for Batman.

At this point in the comic book, most comic book readers aren't thinking "I thought this was Robin vs. Ra's al Ghul! Not Robin vs. some idiot from a different dimension or future timeline!" because most comic book readers don't think while they read their comic books. Like pigs at the trough, they gulp down whatever they're given. But not me! I think about these types of things carefully. Most of the time I don't come to the conclusion that Damian Wayne is hallucinating Aion due to the tailor's needle that pricked him during his fitting for his wedding garb. But I probably would come to that conclusion if I weren't taking so many "breaks"!

Anyway, that's what happened. The tailor was an assassin in a certain league run by Damian's grandfather. So it's really Ra's whom Damian is confronting.

Doesn't Batman have some kind of overly expensive alarm system that alerts him to when Ra's al Ghul comes anywhere near the western hemisphere?

Ra's doesn't stop by to kill anybody or steal anything or take control of the entire world for the good of humanity. Like Joker, he just dropped by to make Damian feel like a piece of shit and ruin everybody's good time. Luckily for Damian, he's a disagreeable person who doesn't mind confronting people about their bullshit. So Damian confronts Catwoman about how his role will change after the marriage and she says all the right things. He'll probably be calling her mom from now on although not in front of anybody who will remain alive after hearing it.

Rating: Come on! It was written by Tim Seeley! You expect me to shit on something that Tim Seeley wrote? Even if this was terrible (which it wasn't!), I'd probably give him a pass and blame the editor or food poisoning or the clone that replaced him after one of Marvel's paid assassins took him out in the never ending bloody war between Marvel and DC. This issue works because Tim Seeley understands the characters of Damian and Selina. A writer who only writes comic books and not stories would have made this all about Damian winning a physical battle over Ra's rather than the emotional one he's confronted with.

* * * * * * * * * *

Nightwing vs. Hush #1
By Seeley, Moore, and Bonvillain

Oh good! Another Seeley comic book! I think it was me who suggested that Tim Seeley and Tom King write some stories together so I'm going to take credit for these Prelude to the Wedding books. You're all welcome.

If any of them are terrible, though, that's not my fault. I'm sure Seeley has a Twitter account. Bitch to him for failing so hard.

This issue begins with Nightwing and Superman throwing Batman a bachelor party. Yikes. A bachelor party devised by the two goodiest two shoes in the DC Universe? Pass.

Nightwing explains that Catwoman and Batman are getting married publicly but not Bruce Wayne and Selina Kyle. Because of "too many secret identity questions raised by a billionaire businessman marrying someone with Selina's rap sheet." But no questions are raised about Batman marrying the criminal and ex-mob boss Catwoman (who everybody knows is Selina Kyle, right? So she can't be seen out with Bruce in public?). I guess everybody just thinks, "Batman's got your Arkham Asylum right here, baby!" "Right here" is when they grab their crotch. Also the everybody who thinks that are guys.


Gross.

Hush crashes the bachelor party because he was on the cover of the comic book and in the title too. He claims to be Batman's "best man" because, I'm assuming, he's forgotten about Joker and Bane and Riddler and Penguin and Bat-mite and Crazy Quilt and Man-bat and Kiteman and Wrath and Calendar Man and every other Batman villain that people think about before Hush (which is all of them). Maybe that's just me because I didn't read Jeff Loeb's epic about the person who mirrored Bruce Wayne in so many ways that readers couldn't help but realize that was the point of the story. Unlike all of Batman's other villains that are reverse mirror images done too subtly for comic book readers to understand. I mean, The Joker is anarchy and death while Batman is order and life. Wrath is exactly like Batman but a bad guy. The Riddler uses logic and rationality for selfish reasons while Batman uses it for the greater good. Catwoman has a vagina while Batman has a penis. The Penguin is fat and out of shape while Batman is a perfect physical specimen. Scarface is a puppet while Batman is a real boy. I could go on and on proving my point but I think you're finally going, "Oh shit! I never even noticed that! So cool!"

I guess Batman and Catwoman's marriage isn't actually supposed to be public. I guess it was just meant for Batfamily and Justice Leaguers because in this comic book and the last one, there was one panel that specifically had a character asking, "How do they know about the wedding?!" And based on last issue's epilogue, it seems the Joker has told all of Batman's foes about it so they can ruin it. Just in case, you know, his discussion with Catwoman failed to cast doubt on the entire thing.


Is Hush implying that Batman and Nightwing engage in anal sex? Because if he is, I need another break.

Nightwing says, "Joker jokes. Riddler riddles. But Hush? You never shut the hell up." That's pretty clever! I bet he thought it up weeks ago and kept bothering Damian about it. "Hey, Damian. Want to hear what I'm going to say to Hush next time we fight? Come on. You know you want to hear it. Stop playing Cheese Viking for a second and listen to this! It's hilarious!"

Hush and Nightwing wind up falling through Superman's malfunctioning lightning door. They wind up in The Betwixt which isn't as delicious as it sounds. It's filled with people with no faces who fell between the cracks of the real world. They're called the Gone Men and they hate people with personalities. Man, I would be public enemy number one in The Betwixt!

Hush learns Nightwing's identity and then reveals that he's changed his face to look like Dick Grayson. Mostly because the Joker showed up at his doorstep one day sobbing over Batman getting married to somebody else. During their chat, Joker couldn't resist telling Hush to be more like Dick Grayson if he ever wants to get into Batman's pants. There's a lot of homoerotic overtones to this story.

Hush winds up disappearing into The Betwixt where he probably belongs, being that it's a place where people who don't know who they are or how they fit in wind up. But Nightwing is saved by Batman and then has that awkward conversation with the groom of an upcoming wedding where you have to ask, "What the fuck do you mean I'm not your best man?!"

Rating: Once again, Seeley knows these characters enough to write a nice little compact story that highlights their relationships. In the first one, Joker fucks with Ra's to try to get him to convince Damian that he's going to be lost and ignored because of Batman's new relationship. It doesn't work because Damian doesn't mind confronting people instead of stewing and pouting and plotting. In this one, Joker fucks with Hush so that Hush will get Nightwing to doubt how close he really is to Batman. But Nightwing is the most giving and sacrificing character in the DC universe, confident of his place in Batman's life. When Dick and Bruce speak at the end, Dick mentions how moving to Blüdhaven wasn't meant to put distance between them but to just allow Nightwing to flourish without needing the safety net. I like to think that this is a slight allusion to Wolfman's 80s New Titans where Dick was a whiny fucking brat who absolutely created tension with Batman in his need to break their ties. Man how I hated that Dick Grayson!

* * * * * * * * * *

Batgirl vs the Riddler #1
By Seeley, Jung, Marzan Jr., and Bellaire

The Joker has now given Riddler an assignment: make Batgirl feel like an old maid. I don't know how that's going to ruin Batman and Catwoman's marriage but then I'm terrible at riddles. Remember that old childhood riddle, "What two letters stop a car from going?" I thought the answer was "F U." I was always a rebellious kid!

That's a lie. I was actually what you might call an autistic kid. I sat and stared at walls until somebody did something I couldn't abide and then I'd throw the mother of all tantrums. But this was in the 70s so I've never been diagnosed with anything but "being stubborn" and "acting like an asshole." I'm so pissed. Just think about all the great medication I could have been doing in the 80s!

Do autistic kids get medication? Or do they just get vaccines? Brazinga!

I don't know who I just brazinga'd in that joke but I'm hoping it was the idiots who think vaccines cause autism. At least if I brazinga'd autistic kids, they won't notice.

I guess if you think vaccines cause autism, I'm joking about a serious subject and it wasn't very funny. And if you're smart and not a complete idiot, I was making fun of anti-vaxxers.

"Can we get to the comic review, Grunion Asshole?" rudely asked some person I imagine is actually reading this. "Fuck you! I'm being my best me!" I respond charmingly before getting straight to the comic review.


See? Just Batfamily and Justice Leaguers. Black Canary isn't either.

Hey, young people? Can you not use "talking" as a euphemism for "fucking"? Because I'm really getting confused and inappropriately horny listening to innocent conversations.

Not that Batgirl is fucking! As we learned from Batgirl's Diary, she's totally a virgin. A super hot virgin who loves one specific Bat-toy.

Batgirl defeats Riddler's riddles in record time which leads to Batman not praising her because he'll probably never know about it anyway. But her being super smart wasn't the point. I mean, it kind of was the point in that Riddler was playing with the idea that maybe he could love somebody as smart as he is. And if Catwoman can find love in the Bat-family, why not Edward Nygma?

In the end, Batgirl turns him down and decides to call up Nightwing to see about losing this thing she's been carrying around for years.

Rating: I'm not sure Tim Seeley could really find a good theme to focus on Batgirl so, since she's the girl in the Bat-family, her story had to be about finding love. What else motivates women?! Heck if I know! It's not like it could be the same things that motivate men, could it? Oh man. Could it?!

* * * * * * * * * *

Red Hood vs Anarky #1
By Seeley, Fernandez, and Kalisz

You know what "Prelude to the Wedding" is? It's "Death of the Family" done better. Here we have a story where the Joker is trying to sow discord and mistrust among the members of the Bat-family. He's trying to ruin Batman's life by making the people who love him turn on him. That's the same story as "Death of the Family." But whereas the Joker succeeded in "Death of the Family" in a way that didn't really have any lasting impact and so it wasn't, ultimately, a fulfilling story, the Joker is failing in this version. Which is how it should have been in Snyder's story! The drama in Snyder's "Death of the Family" was at WB levels. Characters are told something they didn't want to hear from the source to be least trusted and yet they believe it and go off with their feelings hurt. The Bat-family should be above that bullshit. Especially when it's the Joker telling them the things they don't want to hear. "Prelude to the Wedding" is basically the same premise except we have the Bat-family acting the way they should. They're just not buying it. I mean, it seems like maybe Catwoman bought into it in Batman #49. But then she isn't really part of the Bat-family. She can still have doubts that she won't be accepted or that she's not worthy of Batman's love because of her past. But Nightwing turning on Batman? Stupid. Damian? Ridiculous. Batgirl? Well, maybe, if he got creepy on her or something. And Jason Todd? Well, okay. That guy is a psycho.

If I had typed that sentence on tumblr — Jason Todd is a psycho — I would have gotten at least five serious and legitimate death threats.

This is the first Jason Todd story in quite some time that I'm not hating before I've even opened the cover. That's because Tim Seeley is a better writer than most. Usually Red Hood is written by Scott Lobdell so I've developed quite a bias against the character. Which isn't fair to Jason Todd. But since he's fictional, I don't give a shit. I'm no real fan of the current Anarky either. I suppose he's Jason Todd's foil because they have similar beliefs about justice. That means Jason Todd will have a tough time rationalizing his own actions in the name of justice when he watches a douchebag like Anarky do some of the same things.

The best way to begin questioning one's own beliefs is to see somebody you despise or look down upon express the same beliefs.

The issue begins with Catwoman and her friends at the bachelorette party. Most people would not have a problem with this but I'm seriously angry at Tim Seeley now. "Why?" you ask naively and innocently and void of the anger and trauma from having read dozens of books by Ann Nocenti. Oh, I guess the way I wrote that sentence answers the question. It's because the first character to speak is Alice Tesla which reminds me of all the built-up anger and trauma from having read dozens of books by Ann Nocenti. But it's good Tim Seeley remembered to include her because I've always thought she could be a great character if somebody with any writing chops at all got the chance to work with her.

Jason Todd is also at the bachelorette party because Batman asked him to spy on Catwoman. He pretends he's asking Todd to simply keep an eye on her in case there's trouble but Todd knows right away what Batman really wants: photos of Catwoman going down on Poison Ivy while Harley Quinn stands over them pissing. I just made that image up off the top of my head and haven't been thinking of it for years at all.


So according to Bizarro, his sensors haven't picked up something interesting? I'm confused!

So I'm guessing Bizarro no longer says the opposite of what he means. Probably because this is a Lex Luthor clone and not the actual Bizarro from Bizarro World. And also probably because Scott Lobdell forgot that Bizarro's main characteristic was speaking in antonyms. Also don't correct me and tell me the exact reason why Bizarro doesn't speak like Bizarro because I'll just make fun of you for reading Scott Lobdell's Red Hood book.

If Tim Seeley were here, I'd hug him because I'm fairly certain that he's making fun of Scott Lobdell's writing in the following panels:


If you weren't parodying Lobdell, I apologize for comparing you to him, Mr. Seeley.

Another reason I feel like Seeley is parodying Lobdell's writing is by the way he introduced Jason Todd. No, he didn't have Todd narration box "My name is Jason Todd. I was once killed by the Joker. Now I'm back to kick ass and chew gum. And I'm really into ass." But it's close! He does the other thing Lobdell and hack writers who think they're hilarious do! He introduces the character with the following text: "Jason Todd. Former Robin. Formerly murdered. Current Red Hood."

Remember that Swamp Thing event, Rotworld? Remember how all the characters who were being written by terrible writers at the time were the ones who were infected by The Rot? That was one of the best and most subtle digs at the terrible writers working at DC. I still think about it and applaud.

Jason Todd and Anarky fight. Afterwards, Todd listens to Anarky discuss his daddy issues. Then Batman reminds Jason Todd that he failed because Catwoman saw Todd. And Jason Todd gets to have that moment where he sees somebody he despises or looks down upon express his own feelings and sentiments so that he can think, "Is that what I'm like? Ugh. No way. I'm going to be better."


And this is where I, once again, remind everybody that I'm a Goddamned Grandmaster Comic Book Reader! Bam!

Rating: Another good chapter in the "Prelude to the Wedding." It's writers like Tim Seeley who make me wonder how so many other comic book writers have jobs. Can't DC and Marvel tell the difference between terrible writers and great writers? Or do they just not care because fans will read any piece of shit story as long as their favorite character appears in the comic? And, you know, there are a lot of Jason Todd fans willing to read Lobdell's stories.

* * * * * * * * * *

Harley Quinn vs The Joker #1
By Seeley, Basri, and Kholinne

I guess I ran out of things to say because I just sat down and read this one straight through without writing a bunch of digressions while trying to write about the comic book.

Rating: Harley Quinn tries to tell Joker that their relationship was terrible and she was glad to be out of it. Her terrible relationship is one reason she wants to see Batman and Catwoman happily married. So she tries her best to keep Joker occupied by killing him. It doesn't work. The Joker gets away to go cause the havoc he causes in Batman #48 and 49. Which means I read these in the wrong order, I guess! Stupid comic book stack. Can't it stay in the proper order?!

I don't have any insight into the theme of this issue because I think it has something to do with love and relationships and what do I know about those things?! What am I, a Kay Jewelers commercial?! I think the main thrust of the story is that relationships are terrible and they never work out. So Batman and Catwoman would be lucky to have Joker shit all over Batman's wedding and maybe even fuck the cake. If that's not the takeaway then tell me why nobody in the DC Universe has a happy marriage?! Hell, any marriage, happy or otherwise! And you can't point to Lois and Clark because they're from the Pre-Crisis DC Universe when people were allowed to get married. Post Crisis, if you were married, you either got divorced or a divorcee of some other hero travels along a phone line and lands inside your brain, killing you instantly and causing hundreds of people to instantly hate the name Brad Meltzer.

* * * * * * * * * *

Batman #50
By King, Janin, and Chung


Why is this an anniversary issue? Does DC not know how years work? Or weddings?

I can't wait to get to the end of this comic book and think, "Well, that's that! Batman and Catwoman are now happily married and will be until one of them dies in a horrible bat-boating accident!" I'm overjoyed for them, taking this romantic step into a gloriously joyous future laced with dozens of annoying bat and cat babies! I hope Batcow gets to be the ring bearer!

The Joker has been trying to stop this wedding in every way he knows how because he wasn't invited. The big dumb-dumb should have just purchased a copy of this comic book like I did! It says I'm cordially invited right there on the cover! What does "cordially" mean, anyway? Doesn't it mean "injected with alcohol"?


Fact: Snickers' vampires grow their canine teeth in the wrong place. No wait. The fact is the artist of this piece is a dolt.

The story begins with Kite Man getting the crap kicked out of him by Batman and Catwoman because Tom King's hard on for Kite Man is legendary. It's so big and thick and veiny! I wonder what part of Kite Man Tom King likes best? Is it the kite part? Or the man part?

Batman and Catwoman decide to get married on the blood spot where Kite Man was defeated at the break of day. Because that's when bats and cats are most horny. It might also be the place least likely to have a Joker ruin it.

"Isn't it 'the' Joker, Grunion Guy?" you probably aren't now asking. But if you were, I might have to remind you that there are three Jokers in the DC Universe. Nobody has really elaborated on that too much. Maybe nobody was ever meant to. Perhaps it's just an easy way for DC editors to answer huge nerd critics of their comics.

Huge Nerd Critic: "How come the Joker wasn't acting like he usually do...."
DC Editor: "THERE ARE THREE OF THEM! CHRIST YOU NERDS ARE GETTING ON MY LAST TIT!"

Batman finds a judge for the marriage ceremony. His name is Wolfman and he's known as the Raping Judge. Not because he's into rape! That's a terrible thought and nobody should think it. It's because he's named after Marv Wolfman who is totally into rape.

Catwoman's witness for the marriage (her and Batman each get to bring one) is Holly Robinson. Not the Holly Robinson of 21 Jumpstreet fame (is she still famous for that? Or is she famous for marrying Barry Sanders?!) but the one that murdered all of those people who Catwoman was blamed for murdering. She has to break her out of Arkham for the experience. Batman should be totally cool with that and definitely won't be thinking, "What the hell?! How many times do I have to tell her, 'No crime! Bad kitty! You're going to be punished for sure!'?" Then he'll think about her whip and smirk a bit and think, "Oh yeah. I see why she keeps doing crime now."

If you read that last paragraph and began developing a hot take on what I'm not saying around the words I am saying, just stop now. I'm just reporting what Batman was probably thinking. I'm not agreeing with his need to control Catwoman's thoughts and actions! That's all Bruce Wayne, baby!

The issue is made up of a lot of pin-ups by various artists. Laid out over the pin-ups are Batman and Catwoman's words. They're probably their vows but since I'm not done reading, that's just a guess. Anyway, the layout, where everything is kind of a mirror of the opposite page, is pure Tom King which probably pissed off all the Tom King haters. "He's just repeating everything in that way that means nothing except he's trying to be smarter than us! Why the fuck does he have to use form?! And tones?! And theme!? What's wrong with Batman punching stuff for eight pages straight?! So obnoxious!"

I began this review with the joke that the wedding obviously won't work out. This is comic books. Everybody read that initial paragraph and rolled their eyes and thought, "Yeah. We know this is a huge farce. It's going to end in disaster." But how many of you thought, "Grunion Guy probably really means what he's writing here. He wants to see Batman married and happy! The big fag." First off, such language! We all stopped using that word in 2008! I mean 1989! Come on, imaginary reader. Be better! Second, I did mean it. I do mean it. I really hope that Tom King surprises us and he allows Batman and Catwoman to be happily married. Why not for as long as he's writing this book? Why can't they have part of their middle story be one where they get the joy of being together? Who is that going to harm?!

So now you know my secret. No, not that I'm a big fag! Sheesh. You people are terrible. I mean, yeah, that's my secret! But I wouldn't word it that way, you gross jerks. I also wouldn't word it as I'm a little girly girl pussy baby girl butt. I would say I'm a modern man who accepted during college that he loved Sailor Moon in the most innocent and emotional way a man can love a fourteen year old girl cartoon character and who only hid that the show made him weep uncontrollably for ten years, give or take a few.

Selina and Bruce have their big wedding kiss in the exact middle of the book which can't be a good sign for how it's going to end. I mean, they haven't had the wedding yet! They just get all dressed up and then meet, right in the middle, right there on the staples (okay, not exactly because the staples come the page before. But I blame an error in the layout of the advertisements. I see what you were trying to do, Tom King. I got you!). The big loving embrace. The big kiss in their wedding finery. The moment they knew was coming. And hopefully not the last moment they were happy. Don't you dare, Tom King, with your shitty mirror image storytelling that everybody hates (I mean, not me! Just the dumb critics!) . . . don't you dare do that mirror thing with this story. Don't you begin hopeful, get to a middle that's the peak of happiness, and then descend into chaos, despair, and destruction! DON'T YOU FUCKING DO IT, TOM KING!


This is the page immediately after the big kiss (and the pin-ups, of course! Every two page spread of story is followed by two pages of pin-ups and wedding vows). Things are already tumbling down the story's climactic peak!

Of course Alfred is Batman's witness. Even Alfred knew it would be him but he was too polite to assume so he still gets emotional when Bruce asks him. Or, rather, casually tells him like it's no big deal.

On the subject of the pin-ups: they tell the story of Batman and Catwoman across DC's history. It even feels like, in many cases, they use artists chronologically along the way (there are obvious places where this doesn't hold up. But it, mostly, feels fairly close to the mark). They even eventually get to the New 52 on the roof sex scene, and the recent double date with Clark and Lois. It's really quite sweet.

The wedding vows have a lot to do with one partner's thoughts on the other partner's eyes. It's romantic but not in that way that makes me think, "Oh boy! At the end of these vows, they're going to declare their undying love for each other!" The tone feels more like they'll cause me to exclaim, "Oh no! It sounds like they're both reaching the conclusion that maybe they shouldn't get married! But they'll still probably keep up the tradition of fucking on rooftops!"

Also, I'm nearing the end and not a single whiff of Batcow.

As Selina and Holly head to the wedding, Selina mentions that she's currently writing Batman a letter. So that's what the "vows" have been. Her letter. And Batman's letter to her (I'm assuming on the next page which I have yet to read, he'll confess to Alfred that he's also been working on a letter!). Both of which, as I mentioned in the previous paragraph, seem to be heading to the conclusion that neither one will want to go through with the marriage because they feel it will go against, and possibly change, the very nature of the other person. So. You know. Shit.

And so, Selina declares, in her letter, that she can't marry Batman because it will kill him. And Bruce declares in his letter, that maybe he can become somebody happy. Maybe he can change. Which isn't exactly what I expected. I thought they would both agree. So, at least, Tom King surprised me on that level. And, apparently, that was the point since Holly goes back to Arkham to discover Bane and a bunch of other people who have been highlighted in Tom King's run (along with Poorly Shaved Batman. I don't remember if that's somebody or if that's Batman and this is all a hallucination of some kind or maybe Tom King is speaking through Bane or maybe...well, I don't know!). Bane says, "The Bat is broken," (which is a terrific pun that somebody once thought up and now Batman writers can't stop using!).

Rating: I guess giving Batman hope that he can be happy and then taking it away is supposed to break Batman? But isn't the whole point that Batman's unhappiness and grim misery and obsession over justice are the only things keeping him Batman? Won't this devastating loss just make him even more Batmanier?! Or do the members of Batman's rogue's gallery all believe he's going to become a pouting emo baby for the next few months? A total pushover which they can take advantage of?! Anyway, it was a good story well told. The only flaw was that the staples were off by one page. Stupid layout editor! Somebody should fire whoever's job it was to place the ads!

* * * * * * * * * *

LETTERS TO ME!

Upright writes: “Do I like Elfquest?”

Rolls up sleeve.

“I think so.”

No story needs to be told once the reveal is done. That’s why Han’s story should have just been left alone; we knew enough!


I reply: Why are you rolling up your sleeves when answering the Elfquest question? Do you have to show off your massive guns even in an email response? So narcissistic.

Most comic book writers get that "no story needs to be told once the reveal is done" bit so wrong they should probably be marched up against a wall and shot. I mean that figuratively and not Milo Yiannopoulosly! Why would somebody who begins a story in the middle of the action only to revert to the start of the story that nobody now cares about two pages later need to be shot? Other than to satisfy my own dark whims and thirst for innocent blood?

That Solo didn't need to be a film seems so obvious that it obviously had to be a film. People are so thirsty for ignoring the reality around them that they'll lap up any entertainment that gives them more details of a fictional character whose story has already been told. I knew nothing of the plot of Solo when I walked into the movie theater. I was flabbergasted (for me, that means I was slightly surprised. It's hard to get my emotional train moving) that it was telling the Kessel run story. I am not against telling early Han Solo stories. But telling that story was simply to jerk off the fan base. "Oooh! Oooh! I remember when he said that parsec thing about that mission! Fuck yeah Han Solo! Yaaaaaaas! This is everything! And we also get the story about how he won the Millennium Falcon except it in no way matches with Empire! Woo hoo! And the woman he loved knew he was a good guy right from the start! I guess he's always been such a pushover and he's so ethical and moral and heroic but in a rebellious and disagreeable way! And did you notice how he shot Woody first and then Woody commended him on shooting first?! That's where he learned to know when murder is okay and why we can embrace his shooting Greedo first! I can't believe how much cum I now have in my underwear!"

Now, I didn't hate Solo. I enjoyed it. But you can still roll your eyes five million times during a movie while still touching yourself during all of Chewbacca's scenes. It's just that the movie was a huge missed opportunity (in my eyes, of course! I know what the new controllers of the Star Wars franchise are up to. They made the message clear in Rogue One. They are fans of the Star Wars universe who are going to tell stories that revolve around the most minute details which they want to fix. "Can you believe the Death Star had such a huge flaw in its design? Me either! Let's make an entire movie to make that believable! And are you also tired of hearing people complain about the parsecs line as if it's a measurement of time when we all know how to counter that argument but let's make it into a film to shut them up!" (Again, I know I have to state this because people think "being critical" equals "hated the thing" so here it goes: I really liked Rogue One even though it was a story that didn't need to be told).

Solo should have been a one shot story that had nothing to do with the overall Star Wars continuity. If I wrote it, I would have revealed that Han often shoots first in situations that don't always call for it, getting him in more trouble than he'd otherwise have been in. I'd have written in a part for young Lando because Donald Glover as Lando is the best casting call of the Common Era. But he'd have already lost the Falcon to Han and he'd probably be quite a bit butt hurt over it and maybe he'd fuck Chewbacca in a ten minute graphic sex scene. Somewhere in the movie, Han would make up the lie about the Kessel run to save his hide and use it enough times that he realizes it's a good line to drop to line up jobs and get more pussy. And it would definitely not reveal that Han Solo single-handedly kick started the rebellion when he was fifteen years old. Or however old he was supposed to be.

Of course if I were in charge, I probably would have also had Han use a whip in one scene and then wink at the camera. The franchise is almost certainly in better hands than mine.

Back to the initial point though (sometimes I find my way back. Other times I just think I have and proclaim that I'm doing that but I'm really not back to it. I can't tell you which kind of time this is), I'm mostly against telling stories that simply fill in the details on stories that have begun in the middle. There's a delicate balance between beginning a story in the middle and fleshing out the character by revealing things that we weren't privy to before the story began and simply restarting a story that began in the middle so that the entire story can be told in a linear fashion. Look at it this way: is the Star Wars universe better off because we got the prequels? Fuck no! Now we have to live in a world where every clone was basically Boba Fett's dad. Also Boba Fett was Boba Fett's dad. Gross.

What I'm trying to say is if you know more about the Star Wars universe than can be remembered after one viewing of half the movies, you're a fucking nerd. And I mean nerd as an old school insult and not in the cool way popular and good looking people like to giggle and say, "I'm such a huge nerd!" Fuck you, you cultural appropriators! You don't know what it's like to never get laid in high school because you were busy jerking off to that one panel where you could see some serious Phoenix side boob! And also the succubus picture in the Dungeons and Dragons Monster Manual. So sexy!

Upright replied to himself: Oh wait! He said “You tell me,” didn’t he?

I reply: Holy shit. Okay. Now I know why you mentioned that Elfquest bit.

Awesome Virgin: "Do I like Elfquest?"
Awesome Virgin: *rolls up sleeve to show Elfquest tattoo*
Awesome Virgin: "You tell me."

I had completely forgotten about that! And the "I think so" misremember didn't help me remember! I don't remember where this happened though. Was it in that terrible panel at Comicon about the Elfquest movie where Marv Wolfman didn't announce but was probably thinking about the rape scene he was almost certainly going to introduce into the story? Man, what a shit panel. Speaking of questioning one's beliefs due to seeing somebody you despise or look down upon express those beliefs: that day, I begin hating Elfquest after seeing other Elfquest fans in person.