Come on, come on! All I want to know is what was on the platter!
So I'll have to do without snacks. But not without sake! Mmm! Okay Joker! Finish your fucking joke, mother fucker!
It's Valentine's Day and that's the second time I've mentioned Mother. I guess I'll be moving up the psychiatric appointment this week.
I hope Joker gives us the name of his two-faced cat. And I hope it's not Little Two-face.
The Joker has booby trapped the table and Batman's chair so that if he moves, flint will spark and ignite his gasoline covered Batfamily. So now he just has to sit and watch as The Joker reveals what's under the serving tray. I'm so fucking nervous! Joker mentions that Alfred is around and then moves as if he's going to uncover the platter! Oh no!
I knew he wasn't dead! Really! I totes knew it! Now let's see if DC has the balls to let Batman kill The Joker! Or will Batman simply stop the others from killing him, thus garnering hate and resent from the Batfamily and killing their relationships? Thus, Death of the Family!
But first! What exactly does all this mean? The Joker removes his face only to come back but wearing his own face as if it's actually a mask now instead of who he is. And now he's unmasking the other heroes. But these heroes don't need to remove their faces to be unmasked, so my guess is he simply bandaged up their real faces as if removing their costume masks were a wound akin to his. Joker removing his face is all about identity. Is he a different person underneath his now removed face? Is Batman still Batman when the mask is removed? Or is Batman nobody The Joker cares about? It's all about the mask and they all know it. It's a game they play and every single one of them at this table is the mask they wear. Not one of them is a real person when the mask is put away. They're shadows of who they really are. And why would The Joker care about the shadows?
So what's under the covered platters? Their masks, bloody and torn? Or cupcakes (which is my real guess and has been for awhile now!)?
Or you know. Real faces with their masks on them.
The Joker doesn't have the best reason for why he cut off his face and the faces of the rest of the Bats. It's a bit of a Catch-22 moment where The Joker is playing the part of Snowden and his guts falling out to Yossarian's horror at the realization of how fragile we are. But the point The Joker gets to after the why of the cutting off of the faces . . . now that begins to cut at the meat of it.
Please let Batman kill The Joker. Please! That would be the greatest reason for the Reboot! And it might be the greatest evidence for The New 52 Haters that the old universe will eventually come back. Because how can a DC Universe exist without The Joker? Amirite?
It seemed to me at the time that the only thing Batman could possibly write that would expose who the other Batfamily members were was Bruce Wayne's will. Thus the "testament sort of thing" comment. I don't know that this is what that is yet.
"I'm not crying! It's just river water dripping from the ceiling!"
Batman chases after The Joker and The Joker keeps trying to retain the upper hand. But he's lost it now. Batman won't let him get away while Bats goes back to save the others because Batman trusts the others. Batman refuses to "dance" with The Joker. Batman refuses to "quarrel" with The Joker. Batman finally refuses to do any of this on The Joker's terms. So The Joker tries once more to get away.
Now Batman is either going to actually kill him or sit him down and give him a rational, coldly logical, unarguable reason as to why he refuses to kill him. I'm a pacifist but I'm still hoping for the former! Kill him! Kill him dead! Make the Reboot mean something!
The best moment of last week's comics was when Frankenstein became Green Lantern in Animal Man #17. This is the best moment so far in this week's comics (even if this is the first of this week's comics I've read!). I think I should do a weekly feature highlighting my favorite panel each week. That's the kind of listy, best-of type thing internet ravens really go for!
Batman heads back to find that The Joker's little book has nothing in it at all. He never knew anybody's secret identities. Therefore Scott Lobdell's stories made no fucking sense. Although Snyder could have told the other writers that it doesn't matter whether The Joker knows their identities or not because The Joker really doesn't fucking care about that shit. So perhaps the other writers were free to be as ambiguous as they wanted to be. Although you could tell Lobdell was trying to be ambiguous like when Jason Todd suddenly realized The Joker was calling him "son" and "boy". But it was too late at that point. The ambiguity was long since killed because The Joker found Jason Todd as Jason Todd in a way that could only have made it Jason Todd The Joker was after. Anyway, that's all sorted and done with. Now the Batman simply heads back to find the Batfamily still stoned on Joker Juice but fighting through the crazy, cuddled up and laughing and holding each other lovingly.
And days pass as everyone recovers.
More awesome stuff with Alfred Pennyworth. Does he steal every scene he's in or what?
I guess The Joker said some pretty nasty things!
Such a waste! Sorry, but it is. I, like most readers, and the poor bastards that plunked their hard-earned $ down to buy this whole event should've been rewarded with a much satisfying payoff that another cliched Joker "Death."
ReplyDeleteWe all know he's not dead; he's the Joker!
Synder's usually pretty good about these things, but this was a waste, and a dragged out waste at that.
And while the scenes with Alfred were indeed nice, it doesn't make up for the majority of mediocrity this things become.
As another blogger pointed out, Synder's trying to be like Morrison when it comes to showcasing the Joker as a threat, but he's not Morrison, not even close.
Hopefully The Riddler arc will be better....
I disagree that people that spent money on this should have been rewarded with something other than what they got. From nearly the beginning, I called how this would end simply by the title "Death of the Family." It was all about creating a huge rift in the Batfamily relationship. Plus, you're paying for the story you get, not the story you want.
ReplyDeleteThat being said, I think DC missed a huge chance here and I don't think it's all Snyder's fault. Snyder might have petitioned up and down for DC to let him kill the Joker. But ultimately, that's an editorial and a business decision on DC's part. And so Snyder wrote a story that fit to The Joker getting away again. I think DC chose poorly though. If you want to do a real Reboot that isn't simply seen as a financial move that will quickly be reversed in a few years when the initial flood of money dries up, you need to take chances. Don't just start everything over half-assed. I mean, Superman has already been killed in this Universe as well. Batman has "died" and been replaced by Dick for a year. Jason Todd has been killed by The Joker. Batgirl had been crippled by the Joker. All the major things that seem to have happened in the old universe have happened here as well. No surprise to anybody and it's been said before by me and others, this Reboot is simply a shell game. And this was a HUGE chance for DC to prove otherwise. They could have shown that they're willing to do some things different this time around.
As far as it being "a dragged out waste", I disagree with that as well. This was a five issue story arc that I think had some really fantastic moments. Remember: it was only five issues. The feeling of it being dragged out, again, is not Snyder's fault but editorials need to tie in all the other Batfamily books (and Suicide Squad as well!?). Did Snyder pull any of the triggers he was threatening to pull? No. Does this surprise anyone? Fuck no. Everybody knew The Joker and Alfred would make it through unscathed. But did people have a grim gnawing doubt that it might be otherwise for awhile? Yes! They did. The story worked.
I was disappointed with the fake cut-off faces being under the platters. That was a big let down because you instantly knew it wasn't true. That was probably the biggest fault here. The Joker cut off his own face but wasn't willing to cut off the faces of the little Bats? To take away their "masks" as well? Instead it's all a "joke" because he's The Joker. It's all an attempt by The Joker to push Batman over the edge and get Batman to kill him so The Joker can "beat" the Batman. If that's true, if that's truly what The Joker is after, then what better way to push Batman over the edge than by harming all the little Bats?
Well, since that didn't happen, one has to look at The Joker's real motives. If The Joker does want Batman to kill him, he wants it done under dubious circumstances that Batman can't eventually rationalize. If Batman had killed The Joker after The Joker had seemingly cut off the little Bat faces and then found out it was a joke, The Batman would doubt his own instincts and actions. But if The Joker had cut off their faces and Batman killed him, Batman wouldn't have any reason to doubt his actions. The Joker would have struck too personally and Batman's vengeance would have been justifiable even in Batman's mind. You know, that's the only place it needs to be justifiable since The Joker's death at this point is completely justifiable by most anyone's standards.
And The Joker isn't afraid to die as we see at the end. We know he won't die from the fall. But he doesn't. He doesn't even consider the fall. The only thing he's afraid of is knowing his true self. He wants no part of being anybody other than The Joker, just as he wants no part of Batman being anyone but The Batman.
So if this story wasn't about The Joker killing the Batfamily members or The Joker getting The Batman to kill him (and it wasn't because none of those things happened), what was it about?
DeleteThis whole story has been about The Joker's love of The Batman and the game they have. The rift created at the end wasn't just a side-effect of The Joker's game. It was his entire plan. The Joker is jealous of the relationship these others have with Bats. Killing them would get them out of the picture but it would also eradicate the current "relationship" between The Joker and The Batman. So The Joker tells them things in the dark of the party before The Batman wakes, things that cause them to sulk and pout and doubt their relationship with Bruce Wayne. What were these things? Who knows. We'll probably find out later. But that moment in the dark before Batman wakes was the meat of this entire story. The Joker never meant to kill them. He meant to hurt Batman by letting the family live but driving them from Batman's grasp. How do you we know this was The Joker's plan the entire time? You have to take into consideration the true ending of the series which I didn't cover: The Joker putting a radioactive element into each of the Bat Family, an element with the symbol Ha.
As a five issue Batman story, it's a well written, enjoyable story that hits a lot of the right notes, both in characterization, tension, and humor. As for what people (especially people that understand comics in general and DC Comics in particular) thought it would be that it didn't live up to? Well, I guess we can all keep dreaming that DC will one day really go for broke and change things up. But I guess you have to have the guy running the company really hate a character for things to change (Poor Ted Kord!).